Anne de Graaf's blog: International-Intrigue-Injustice

31 January 2012

Passing

Filed under: Aids survival,PhD: South Africa!,The Children's Voices — annedegraaf @ 3:41 pm

Am thinking in terms of shared complicities and collective futures. No innocents involved. All share responsibility. Any society that buys into victimization forfeits its own power, handing its ability to reinvent itself to the perpetrators. So, (take a leap with me here), does the language of human rights equal victimhood, thereby disempowering the very people it’s meant to strengthen?

Am thinking critique is every society’s best friend.

Listened to a group of students a few days ago who talked about ignorance as the number-one problem in South Africa. Other songs on the Top Ten: lack of wise leadership, corruption, material disparity, and people not realizing how to reach their potential.

”What would it take?” I asked (you never know). They said, mentorship programs, more access to sports to level the playing field, a new identity to replace their parents’ broken record about colonialization and apartheid legacies, investment in civil society, community support. Oh yeah.

Then they told me stories of seeing people, really seeing them: seeing their pain and dreams and how sharing in fear or joy melted the divisions. “A friend of mine was raped by her uncle and gave birth as a result when she was 13. She went back to school and the community helped her keep her child. Now she runs a peer mentorship program and center for HIV and rape counseling.”

I already knew from previous trips that the shoulders of young people here must grow to bear adult-sized burdens. “Child-headed households” is the fancy name for kids who have no one but each other—an older brother or sister raising younger siblings, scraping together school fees, putting shoes on the little ones so they’ll still be allowed into school, worrying about where the one meal every day will come from, walking the tightrope between gang protection and drug markets. The aloneness is because my generation has more or less died out due to AIDS. So either the gogos, or grandmothers must raise their grandchildren, or worse, the orphans look after each other. During a previous trip here, Mbeki’s denials of the pandemic literally cost lives. Now some HIV patients have access to drugs, and there is more information about healthy diets, and children as young as 8 sometimes hear about the absolute necessity of using condoms. But it remains a taboo subject, and when I ask about a student’s family, they still look away and talk of fathers who died of TB or mothers who died of malaria. Never mind that this area is malaria-free.

So what would it mean to not see these young people as victims?

Life feels very close here because death treads so near.

3 Comments »

  1. Learning, praying with you

    Comment by Belinda — 10 February 2012 @ 3:03 pm | Reply

  2. There seem to be no all-encompassing answers except God. Can I ask who is Daw in the last chapter of Into the Nevernight? We are discussing the book at our bookclub meeting next week. I had truly not ever thought about what sustained the continuous conflicts in Africa.

    Comment by Susan — 21 February 2012 @ 4:12 am | Reply

  3. Greetings–just learned that you are also working on Youth and Conflict through our mutual friend Valerie.

    I enjoyed this post, quite a lot, and it reminded me of an article I read as part of the theory and practice of peacemaking paper I’m working on at the moment:

    Kemper, Yvonne, “Youth in War-to-Peace Transitions: Approaches of International Organizations,” Berghof Report Nr. 10. Berlin: Berghof Center for Constructive Conflict Management, 2005

    In the article, Kemper describes three different models for conceptualizing youth in conflict-to-peace transitions, one based on human rights and international law, another based on economic principles, and a third based on socio-political youth empowerment. Like you, she points out that the human rights approach, which seems to work primarily based on the rights of a child to be returned to their family, with a child defined as a person under 18 years of age, and not taking into account the accelerated rate that young people inherit the responsibilities and opportunities of adults during a war. She describes two alternative models, and some of the organizations that espouse and practice them. You can find a full PDF copy of the article from the author here:

    http://www.icyrnet.net/UserFiles/File/Resources/BR10e.pdf

    Comment by dsorge — 26 March 2012 @ 6:07 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: